Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Module Theory : Endomorphism rings and direct sum decompositions in some classes of modules, PDF eBook

Module Theory : Endomorphism rings and direct sum decompositions in some classes of modules PDF

Part of the Progress in Mathematics series

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

This expository monograph was written for three reasons.

Firstly, we wanted to present the solution to a problem posed by Wolfgang Krull in 1932 [Krull 32].

He asked whether what we now call the "Krull-Schmidt Theorem" holds for ar- tinian modules.

The problem remained open for 63 years: its solution, a negative answer to Krull's question, was published only in 1995 (see [Facchini, Herbera, Levy and Vamos]).

Secondly, we wanted to present the answer to a question posed by Warfield in 1975 [Warfield 75].

He proved that every finitely pre- sented module over a serial ring is a direct sum of uniserial modules, and asked if such a decomposition was unique.

In other words, Warfield asked whether the "Krull-Schmidt Theorem" holds for serial modules.

The solution to this problem, a negative answer again, appeared in [Facchini 96].

Thirdly, the so- lution to Warfield's problem shows interesting behavior, a rare phenomenon in the history of Krull-Schmidt type theorems.

Essentially, the Krull-Schmidt Theorem holds for some classes of modules and not for others.

When it does hold, any two indecomposable decompositions are uniquely determined up to a permutation, and when it does not hold for a class of modules, this is proved via an example.

For serial modules the Krull-Schmidt Theorem does not hold, but any two indecomposable decompositions are uniquely determined up to two permutations.

We wanted to present such a phenomenon to a wider math- ematical audience.

Information

Other Formats

Information