Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Debating Autonomy, Paperback / softback Book

Paperback / softback

Description

Who is best placed in medical decision-making, to decide: the patient or the doctor?

In this important new volume in the Debating Law series, Imogen Goold argues that the law should strongly support individual choice and autonomy.

Medical decisions, she argues, are deeply personal, with life-changing consequences, and it must be for the patient to make them.

Even in the event of those decisions ultimately harming the patient, fully informed, autonomous decisions by the patient must be supported by the law. Jonathan Herring counters, arguing that placing the an overriding emphasis on personal autonomy does not always achieve the best outcome for the patient.

He argues instead that in certain circumstances, best interest considerations must take precedence over autonomous decision-making.

He suggests that the law does not support autonomy as is commonly claimed, but instead takes a much more nuanced approach, balancing the principle of autonomy against other principles and considerations.

This is a fascinating addition to this compelling series which grapples with the most pressing issues facing lawyers today.

Information

£19.99

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Debating Law series  |  View all