Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit : The Syntax and Semantics of Adjectival Verb Forms, PDF eBook

Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit : The Syntax and Semantics of Adjectival Verb Forms PDF

Part of the Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics series

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

This book examines several thousand examples of tense-aspect stem participles in the Rigveda, and the passages in which they appear, in terms of both their syntax and semantics.

The Rigveda is an ancient collection of sacred Indian hymns, written in Vedic Sanskrit, and is one of the oldest extant texts in any Indo-European language.

It is also a poetic text in which deliberate obscurity is the governing aesthetic and in which the rules of languageare pushed to their limits in order to produce the ideal poetic expression.

Many Vedic sentences are of controversial, disputed meaning, and Vedic scholarship is thus fraught with controversy. John J. Lowe applies formal linguistic analysis to the data and produces a comprehensive formal model of how participles are used.

The author uses his findings to recategorize the data, by defining certain stems and stem-types as outside the synchronic category of participle on the basis of their syntactic and semantic properties.

He suggests alternative sources for these forms and considers the linguistic processes that transformed old participles into non-participial entities.

In hisconclusion he reassesses the category of participles within the verbal and nominal systems, looks at their prehistory in Proto-Indo-European, and describes their universal, typological characteristics.

Among his conclusions are that tense-aspect-stem participles have the technical properties of adjectivalverbs, not verbal adjectives, and that such participles are not fully dependent on corresponding finite verbal forms.

That is, a perfect participle, for example, need not share all the semantic and functional features of the finite perfect forms built to the same stem.

These and many other conclusions drawn either directly challenge or radically revise received opinion and recent work.

Information

Information

Also in the Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics series  |  View all