Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Xenophon's Memorabilia : Chiefly From the Text of Kuhner; With Notes, PDF eBook

Xenophon's Memorabilia : Chiefly From the Text of Kuhner; With Notes PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Whilst the greatest effort has been made to ensure the quality of this text, due to the historical nature of this content, in some rare cases there may be minor issues with legibility.

The second count in the indictment was, as already mentioned, that Socrates introduced new divinities.

This charge arose mainly from the assertion of Socrates that he received warnings from the divine (to sac/levaov).

Xenophon, in reply 6, observes that there was nothing peculiar or heterodox in this, for others believe in augury, omens, and the like; believe, that is, that through the instrumentality of birds, sounds, &c., the Gods disclose to men future events.

It is not the birds or sounds which convey this knowledge of the future, but the divine power through their means.

This was all that Socrates meant when he spoke of the intimations given him by the divine (to Sawdwov).

These remarks coincide with a passage in the Apologia (xenophon's) where Socrates argues that as 76 30.41.6v was a divine voice, and the sounds of birds from which auguries were drawn were also voices, there was nothing peculiar in his views on this point.

In the Apologia of Plato this count in the indictment is virtually passed over without any answer.

Information

Information