Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Elbridge Gerry's Salamander : The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution, Hardback Book

Elbridge Gerry's Salamander : The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution Hardback

Part of the Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions series

Hardback

Description

The Supreme Court's reapportionment decisions, beginning with Baker v.

Carr in 1962, had far more than jurisprudential consequences.

They sparked a massive wave of extraordinary redistricting in the mid-1960s.

Both state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn more comprehensively - by far - than at any previous time in America's history.

Moreover, they changed what would happen at law should a state government fail to enact a new districting plan when one was legally required.

This book provides a detailed analysis of how judicial partisanship affected redistricting outcomes in the 1960s, arguing that the reapportionment revolution led indirectly to three fundamental changes in the nature of congressional elections: the abrupt eradication of a 6% pro-Republican bias in the translation of congressional votes into seats outside the south; the abrupt increase in the apparent advantage of incumbents; and the abrupt alteration of the two parties' success in congressional recruitment and elections.

Information

£55.00

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions series  |  View all