Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Supporting your high street Find out how »
Justifying Transgression : MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANS, AND THE LAW – 1200 to 1700, Hardback Book

Justifying Transgression : MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANS, AND THE LAW – 1200 to 1700 Hardback

Hardback

Out of stock

Description

How do people justify what others see as transgression?

Taking that question to the Persian-Muslim and Latin-Christian worlds over the period 1200 to 1700, this book shows that people in both these worlds invested considerable energy in worrying, debating, and writing about proscribed practices.

It compares how people in the two worlds came to terms with the proscriptions of sodomy, idolatry, and usury.

When historians speak of the gap between premodern practice and the legal theory of the time, they tend to ignore the myriad of justifications that filled this gap.

Moreover, a focus on justification evens out many of the contrasts that have been alleged to exist between the two worlds, or the Muslim and Christian worlds more generally.

The similarities outweigh the differences in the ways people came to terms with the various rules of divine law.

The level of flexibility of the theologians and jurists in charge of divine law varied more over time and by topic than between the two worlds.

Both worlds also saw the development of ever more sophisticated justifications.

Amid the increasing complexity of justifications, a particular kind of reasoning emerged: that good outcomes are more important than upholding rules for their own sake.

Information

£54.50

Out of stock
Add to Basket
Sign in to add to wishlist
 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information