Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology : Broad and Narrow Interpretations, PDF eBook

Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology : Broad and Narrow Interpretations PDF

Edited by P.T. Durbin

Part of the Philosophy and Technology series

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

BACKGROUND: DEPARTMENTS, SPECIALIZATION, AND PROFESSIONALIZATION IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION For over half of its history, U.S. higher education turned out mostly cler- gymen and lawyers.

Looking back on that period, we might be tempted to think that this meant specialized training for the ministry or the practice of law.

That, however, was not the case. What a college education in the U.S. prepared young men (almost exclusively) for, from the founding of Harvard College in 1636 through the founding of hundreds of denominational colleges in the first two-thirds of the nineteenth century, was leadership in the community.

Professionalization and specialization only began to take root, and then became the dominant mode in U.S. higher education, in the period roughly from 1860--1920.

In subsequent decades, that seemed to many critics to signal the end of what might be called "education in wisdom," the preparation of leaders for a broad range of responsibilities.

Professionalization, specialization, and departmentalization of higher education in the U.S. began in the last quarter of the nineteenth century.

Information

Information