Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Having It Both Ways : Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics, PDF eBook

Having It Both Ways : Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics PDF

Edited by Guy Fletcher, Michael Ridge

Part of the Oxford Moral Theory series

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

A recent trend in metaethics has been to reject the apparent choice between pure cognitivism, where moral (and other normative) judgments are understood as representational or belief-like states, and pure non-cognitivism, where they are understood as non-representational or desire-like states.

Rather, philosophers have adopted views which seek in some way to combine the strengths of each side while avoiding the standard problems for each.

Some such views claim that moral judgments are complexes of belief-like and desire-like components.

Other views claim that normative language serves both to ascribe properties and to express desire-like attitudes.

This collection of twelve new essays examines the prospects for such 'hybrid views' of normative thought and language.

The papers, which focus mainly on moral thought and talk, provide a guide to this debate while also pushing it forward along numerous fronts.

Information

Information

Also in the Oxford Moral Theory series  |  View all