Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

A Critique of the Ontology of Intellectual Property Law, Paperback / softback Book

A Critique of the Ontology of Intellectual Property Law Paperback / softback

Part of the Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law series

Paperback / softback

Description

Intellectual property (IP) law operates with the ontological assumption that immaterial goods such as works, inventions, and designs exist, and that these abstract types can be owned like a piece of land.

Alexander Peukert provides a comprehensive critique of this paradigm, showing that the abstract IP object is a speech-based construct, which first crystalised in the eighteenth century.

He highlights the theoretical flaws of metaphysical object ontology and introduces John Searle's social ontology as a more plausible approach to the subject matter of IP.

On this basis, he proposes an IP theory under which IP rights provide their holders with an exclusive privilege to use reproducible 'Master Artefacts.' Such a legal-realist IP theory, Peukert argues, is both descriptively and prescriptively superior to the prevailing paradigm of the abstract IP object.

This work was originally published in German and was translated by Gill Mertens.

Information

Other Formats

£26.99

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law series  |  View all