Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

The Making of Marx's Critical Theory : A Bibliographical Analysis, EPUB eBook

The Making of Marx's Critical Theory : A Bibliographical Analysis EPUB

Part of the Routledge Library Editions: Marxism series

EPUB

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Marx’s written output was massive. Much of it remained unpublished in his own lifetime and there is still no complete edition of the extant works, although most have been published in one form or another.

This book, first published in 1983, provides an analytical guide to the complex chronological and evolving substantive structure of Marx’s main writings in critical theory.

The format is concise and accessible, with each phase of Marx’s evolving critical theory of capitalist society being summarized in a diagram.

An invaluable guide for students of Marx, it will lead them through the maze of his works to a potentially deeper understanding of his thought.

Allen Oakley believes that, in order to fully comprehend Marx’s critical theory, it is essential to trace its complex evolution.

Any serious study of Marx’s critique of capitalism must begin with an appreciation of the bibliographical framework within which his evolving ideas were manifested.

Oakley is opposed to approaches to the study of Marx’s critique which take little account of its chronology; such approaches, he believes, are incomplete and potentially misleading with respect to the meaning and significance of the critique.

The book includes bibliographical evidence about the unfinished state of Marx’s critical project and its ever-changing scope and organization.

It argues, therefore, that the methodological and substantive status of Capital must be interpreted cautiously, for bibliographical evidence shows it to be an unfinished climax to an ambiguous critic-theoretical project of uncertain dimensions.

To read it as in any sense a final and definitive statement of Marx’s critical theory is, the author believes, to be deluded.

Information

Other Formats

Information

Also in the Routledge Library Editions: Marxism series  |  View all