Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Quantum Groups and Their Primitive Ideals, PDF eBook

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

by a more general quadratic algebra (possibly obtained by deformation) and then to derive Rq [G] by requiring it to possess the latter as a comodule.

A third principle is to focus attention on the tensor structure of the cat- egory of (!; modules.

This means of course just defining an algebra structure on Rq[G]; but this is to be done in a very specific manner.

Concretely the category is required to be braided and this forces (9.4.2) the existence of an "R-matrix" satisfying in particular the quantum Yang-Baxter equation and from which the algebra structure of Rq[G] can be written down (9.4.5).

Finally there was a search for a perfectly self-dual model for Rq[G] which would then be isomorphic to Uq(g).

Apparently this failed; but V. G. Drinfeld found that it could be essentially made to work for the "Borel part" of Uq(g) denoted U (b) and further found a general construction (the Drinfeld double) q mirroring a Lie bialgebra.

This gives Uq(g) up to passage to a quotient. One of the most remarkable aspects of the above superficially different ap- proaches is their extraordinary intercoherence.

In particular they essentially all lead for G semisimple to the same and hence "canonical", objects Rq[G] and Uq(g), though this epithet may as yet be premature.

Information

Other Formats

Information

Also in the Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge / A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathemati series  |  View all