Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Cancer : Survival, Quality of Life and Ethical Implications, PDF eBook

Cancer : Survival, Quality of Life and Ethical Implications PDF

Edited by Breanne Lechner, Ronald Chow, Natalie Pulenzas, Marko Popovic, Na Zhang, Xiaojing Zhang, Edward Chow, Joav Merrick

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Several medical options in palliative care can have complex moral, religious, cultural, medical and legal issues.

These treatment options, such as assisted suicide, rehydration, parenteral nutrition and cardiopulmonary resuscitation have been heavily debated in the literature.

Physician-assisted suicide is a controversial topic for debate, with growing pressure from advocacy groups for legalization in regions that have yet to decide.

Currently, there is substantial opposition from concerned medical professionals.

However, a school of medical professionals acknowledges that physician-assisted suicide may have a role in terminal care.

The debate over the use of artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in terminal illness is also contentious despite extensive ethical and empirical research.

Advocates for and against ANH both agree that the most compassionate and humane option for patients near the end of life is hospice and/or palliative care.

However, many of those who support ANH do not seem to appreciate that the standard palliative practice is to avoid the use of ANH in almost all instances.

These topics remain heavily disputed in the medical community.

In formulating a satisfactory answer, we need to remind ourselves that we cannot generalize a treatment as a correct or incorrect option.

Rather, we need to consider each case individually, weigh the risks and benefits of each treatment, and individually consider treatment options in a multidisciplinary care model.

Information

Information