Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Toxic Torts : Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice, PDF eBook

Toxic Torts : Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

The relationship between science, law and justice has become a pressing issue with US Supreme Court decisions beginning with Daubert v.

Merrell-Dow Pharmaceutical. How courts review scientific testimony and its foundation before trial can substantially affect the possibility of justice for persons wrongfully injured by exposure to toxic substances.

If courts do not review scientific testimony, they will deny one of the parties the possibility of justice.

Even if courts review evidence well, the fact and perception of greater judicial scrutiny increases litigation costs and attorney screening of clients.

Mistaken review of scientific evidence can decrease citizen access to the law, increase unfortunate incentives for firms not to test their products, lower deterrence for wrongful conduct and harmful products, and decrease the possibility of justice for citizens injured by toxic substances.

This book introduces these issues, reveals the relationships that pose problems, and shows how justice can be denied.

Information

Other Formats

Information