Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Babies and Beasts : THE ARGUMENT FROM MARGINAL CASES, Paperback / softback Book

Babies and Beasts : THE ARGUMENT FROM MARGINAL CASES Paperback / softback

Paperback / softback

Description

           Both its defenders and detractors         have described the argument from marginal cases as the most important         to date in defense of animal rights.

Hotly debated among philosophers         for some twenty years, the argument concludes that no morally relevant         characteristic distinguishes human beings–including infants, the         severely retarded, the comatose, and other "marginal cases"--from         any other animals.       Babies and Beasts presents         the first book-length exploration of the broad range of views relating         to the argument from marginal cases and sorts out and evaluates its various         uses and abuses.       Daniel Dombrowski analyzes         the views of many who are prominent in the debate--         Peter Singer, Thomas Regan, H.

J. McCloskey, Jan Narveson, John Rawls,         R.

G. Frey, Peter Carruthers, Michael Leahy, Robert Nozick, and James         Rachels are included--in a volume that will be essential to philosophers,         animal rights activists, those who work in clinical settings, and others         who must sometimes deal with "marginal cases."  

Information

Save 16%

£19.99

£16.79

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information