Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation : Between Entrapment and Creativity, Paperback / softback Book

Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation : Between Entrapment and Creativity Paperback / softback

Part of the Studies in International Law series

Paperback / softback

Description

This book explores the question of how the multiplication of judicial decisions on international law has influenced the way in which legal findings in international law adjudication are justified.

International law practitioners frequently cite judicial decisions to persuade.

Courts interpreting international law are no exception to this practice.

However, judicial decisions do much more than persuading: they enable and constrain interpretive discretion. Instead of taking the road of the sources of international law, this book turns to the somewhat uncharted terrain of legal argumentation.

Using international criminal law as a case study, it shows how the growing number of judicial decisions has normalised courts’ resort to them in legal justification and enabled some argumentative practices to become constitutive of international law.

In so doing, it critically revisits the implications of an iterative use of judicial decisions, and reassesses the influence of the ‘judicialisation turn’ on the ways in which the meaning of international law is formed, shaped and reshaped by reference to judicial decisions.

Information

Information