Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Imaging in Oncological Urology, PDF eBook

Imaging in Oncological Urology PDF

Edited by Jean J. M. C. H. Rosette, Michael J. Manyak, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Hessel Wijkstra

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Thepastdecadehasseendramaticadvances inurologyandimaging.

Thesechangesareevident in improvements in laparoscopic surgery as well as in the emergence of multidetector CT, with multiplanar reformatting and FDG-PET-CT as routine imaging methods.

The new minimally invasive procedures often require more exacting imaging as the surgeon does not have the same visual ?eld of view as was possible with open procedures.

Thus, it is appropriate now to p- vide an update on imaging advances for the bene?t of urologists and radiologists alike.

The increasing number of innovative imaging approaches to urologic tumors including CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and endoscopic imaging can be perplexing and lead to over- and underesti- tions of the capabilities of modern imaging on the part of those who interpret them and those who use the information they provide for patient management.

There is a growing "exp- tations gap" between what is expected and what is possible that needs to be closed.

While previous books have focused on the more common urologic tumors such as bladder, prostate, andkidneycancer,nonehasattemptedacomprehensivereviewofthestateoftheartofimaging in most of the tumors involved in urologic oncology.

Imaging in Urologic Oncology addresses these challenges.

In the modern imaging department it is easy to forget how useful conventional plain rad- graphy can be in urologic diagnosis.

Much of our current understanding of urologic disease is based on the "classic appearance" on intravenous urograms, cystograms, or retrograde pye- grams.

Therefore, conventional imaging provides the ?rst "layer" in our understanding of u- logic tumors.

The next layer is cross-sectional imaging.

Information

Information