Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, PDF eBook

The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research PDF

Part of the Issues in Biomedical Ethics series

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Embryonic stem cell research holds unique promise for developing therapies for currently incurable diseases and conditions, and for important biomedical research.

However, the process through which embryonic stem cells are obtained involves the destruction of early human embryos.

Katrien Devolder focuses on the tension between the popular view that an embryo should never be deliberately harmed or destroyed, and the view that embryonic stem cell research, because ofits enormous promise, must go forward.

She provides an in-depth ethical analysis of the major philosophical and political attempts to resolve this tension.

One such attempt involves the development of a middle ground position, which accepts only types or aspects of embryonic stem cell research deemedcompatible with the view that the embryo has a significant moral status.

An example is the position that it can be permissible to derive stem cells from embryos left over from in vitro fertilisation but not from embryos created for research.

Others have advocated a technical solution. Several techniques have been proposed for deriving embryonic stem cells, or their functional equivalents, without harming embryos.

An example is the induced pluripotent stem cell technique.

Throughhighlighting inconsistencies in the arguments for these positions, Devolder argues that the central tension in the embryonic stem cell debate remains unresolved.

This conclusion has important implications for the stem cell debate, as well as for policies inspired by this debate.

Other Formats

Also in the Issues in Biomedical Ethics series  |  View all