Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Outlines of Skeptical-Dogmatism : On Disbelieving Our Philosophical Views, Hardback Book

Outlines of Skeptical-Dogmatism : On Disbelieving Our Philosophical Views Hardback

Hardback

Description

The ancient Pyrrhonians skeptics suspended judgment about all philosophical views.

Their main opponents were the Dogmatists—those who believed their preferred philosophical views.

In Outlines of Skeptical-Dogmatism: On Disbelieving Our Philosophical Views, Mark Walker argues, contra Pyrrhonians and Dogmatists, for a "darker" skepticism: we should disbelieve our philosophical views.

On the question of political morality, for example, we should disbelieve libertarianism, conservativism, socialism, liberalism, and any alternative ideologies.

Since most humans have beliefs about philosophical subject matter, such as beliefs about religious and political matters, humanity writ large should disbelieve their preferred philosophical views.

Walker argues that Skeptical-Dogmatism permits a more realistic estimation of our epistemic powers.

Dogmatists who believe their view is correct, while believing that two or more competitor views of their opponents are false, must—at least implicitly—take themselves to be “über epistemic superiors” to their disagreeing colleagues.

Such a self-assessment is as implausible as it is hubristic.

Skeptical-Dogmatism, in contrast, permits a more realistic and humbler epistemic self-conception.

The author also shows that there are no insuperable practical difficulties in living as a Skeptical-Dogmatist.

Information

Save 6%

£92.00

£85.99

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information