Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

The Aesthetics of Argument, PDF eBook

The Aesthetics of Argument PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Argument and imagination are often interdependent. The Aesthetics of Argument is concerned with how this relationship may bear on argument's concern with truth, not just persuasion, and with the enhancement of understanding such interdependence may bring.

The rationality of argument, conceived as the advancement of reasons for or against a claim, is not simply a matter of deductive validity.

Whether arguments are relevant, have force, or look foolish-orwhether an example is telling or merely illustrative—cannot always be assessed in these terms.

Martin Warner presents a series of case studies which explore how analogy, metaphor, narrative, image, and symbol can be used in different ways to frame one domain in terms of another, severally or in variouscombinations, and how criteria drawn from the study of imaginative literature may have a bearing on their truth-aptness.

Such framing can be particularly effective in argumentative roles which invite self-interrogation, as Plato saw long ago.

Narrative in such cases may be fictional, whether parabolic or dramatic, autobiographical or biographical, and in certain cases may seek to show how standard conceptualizations are inadequate.

Beyond this, whether in poetry or prose and not only withrespect to narrative, the "logic" of imagery enables us to make principled sense of our capacity to grasp imagistically elements of our experience through words whose use at the imaginative level has transformed their standard conceptual relationships, and hence judge the credibility of associatedarguments.

Assessment of the argumentative imagination requires criteria drawn not only from dialectic and rhetoric, but also from poetics.

Information

Other Formats

Information