Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Apolipoproteins in Lipid Disorders : Risk Assessment and Monitoring, PDF eBook

Apolipoproteins in Lipid Disorders : Risk Assessment and Monitoring PDF

Edited by Maryvonne Rosseneu, Kurt Widhalm, Jochen Jarausch

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

There is increasing evidence for the clinicial value of the apo- lipoprotein measurements.

Besides cholesterol in plasma and li- poprotein fractions, which is currently used as an indicator of cardiovascular risk, the measurement of the AI and B apolipopro- teins can provide additional information about the patients' clinical status.

Several studies show that apo B is higher and apo AI is lower in patients with angiographically documented coronary heart dis- ease than in symptomatic patients without coronary heart disease.

Moreover, discriminant analysis indicated that the concentration of Apo AI and B in plasma are better discriminators than lipo- protein cholesterol for identifying patients with coronary heart disease.

In some studies the apo Bjapo AI ratio appears to be a more powerful predictor than individual lipoproteins.

In a recent study carried out in men, apolipoproteins AI and B were better correlated with the severity of cardiovascular disease than HDL and LDL cholesterol.

The predictive power of apolipoproteins could however not be demonstrated in all studies and the value of apolipoprotein measurements in the field of clinical chemistry is still controversial.

This is probably due to discrepancies between the results of various studies, arising from differences in the type of immunoassays, the lack of universal reference materials, differ- ences between study protocols, variations in the selection of patients and in the grading and interpretation of coronary lesions.

Information

Information