Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Perceptions of a Polarized Court : How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court's Public Image, Hardback Book

Perceptions of a Polarized Court : How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court's Public Image Hardback

Hardback

Description

Like our divided nation, the Supreme Court is polarized.

But does a split among Supreme Court justices—particularly when it occurs along ideological lines—hurt public perception and the Court’s ability to muster popular support for its rulings?

Michael Salamone’s Perceptions of a Polarized Court offers the first comprehensive, empirical analysis of how divisiveness affects the legitimacy of the Court’s decisions. Salamone looks specifically at the Roberts Court years—which are characterized by unprecedented ideological and partisan polarization among the justices—to evaluate the public consequences of divided Supreme Court rulings.

He also analyzes both the media’s treatment of Supreme Court decisions and public opinion toward the Court’s rulings to show how public acceptance is (or is not) affected. Salmone contends that judicial polarization has had an impact on the manner in which journalists report on the Supreme Court.

However, contrary to expectation, Court dissent may help secure public support by tapping into core democratic values.

Information

Other Formats

Save 4%

£85.00

£81.45

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information