Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Evaluation of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas, Paperback / softback Book

Evaluation of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas Paperback / softback

Paperback / softback

Description

Safeguarding U.S. agriculture from foreign animal diseases and protecting our food system require cutting-edge research and diagnostic capabilities.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S.

Department of Agriculture (USDA) have embarked on an important mission to replace the aging Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) with a new facility, the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF).

When operational, this new facility would be the world's fourth biosafety level-4 laboratory capable of large animal research.

It would serve as a critical world reference laboratory for identifying emerging and unknown disease threats, and would thus be a critical asset in securing the future health, wealth, and security of the nation. DHS selected Manhattan, Kansas, as the site for the new NBAF after an extensive site-selection process that involved an environmental impact statement.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) raised concerns about DHS's analysis of the potential spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDv), one of the most serious foreign animal disease threats.

Congress directed DHS to conduct a site-specific risk assessment (SSRA) for the NBAF, instructed the National Research Council (NRC) to independently evaluate the SSRA, and prohibited obligation of NBAF construction funds until the NRC review was complete. Congress mandated that DHS revise its SSRA to address shortcomings of the 2010 SSRA, directed the NRC to evaluate the updated SSRA (uSSRA), and again prohibited obligation of construction funds until the completion of the second review.

The scope for both of these SSRA reports addressed accidental release of pathogens from the NBAF in Manhattan, Kansas and excluded terrorist acts and malicious threats from its risk assessments.

Evaluation of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas is the evaluation of the final uSSRA. Table of ContentsFront MatterSummary1 Introduction2 Evaluation of Design, Operations, and Response Planning asRelated to the Risk Assessment3 Evaluation of Risk Approach and Calculations4 Evaluation of Accident Event Modeling5 Evaluation of Fate and Transport Modeling6 Evaluation of Epidemic Modeling7 Evaluation of Economic Modeling8 Evaluation of Biosafety Level 4 Assessment9 Overall Assessment, Findings, and ConclusionsAppendixesAppendix A: Committee BiosketchesAppendix B: Meeting Agendas and Lists of Public Participants

Information

Other Formats

Save 1%

£33.00

£32.59

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information