Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Consciousness and Moral Responsibility, PDF eBook

Consciousness and Moral Responsibility PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Neil Levy presents an original theory of freedom and responsibility.

Cognitive neuroscience and psychology provide a great deal of evidence that our actions are often shaped by information of which we are not conscious; some psychologists have concluded that we are actually conscious of very few of the facts we respond to.

But most people seem to assume that we need to be conscious of the facts we respond to in order to be responsible for what we do.

Some thinkershave argued that this naïve assumption is wrong, and we need not be conscious of these facts to be responsible, while others think it is correct and therefore we are never responsible.

Levy argues that both views are wrong. He sets out and defends a particular account of consciousness—the globalworkspace view—and argues this account entails that consciousness plays an especially important role in action.

We exercise sufficient control over the moral significance of our acts to be responsible for them only when we are conscious of the facts that give to our actions their moral character.

Further, our actions are expressive of who we are as moral agents only when we are conscious of these same facts.

There are therefore good reasons to think that the naïve assumption, thatconsciousness is needed for moral responsibility, is in fact true.

Levy suggests that this entails that people are responsible less often than we might have thought, but the consciousness condition does not entail that we are never morally responsible.

Information

Information