Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered, Paperback / softback Book

The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered Paperback / softback

Part of the Theory and Decision Library A: series

Paperback / softback

Description

This book argues that critics of consequentialism have not been able to make a successful and comprehensive case against all versions of consequentialism because they have been using the wrong methodology.

This methodology relies on the crucial assumption that consequentialist theories share a defining characteristic.

This text interprets consequentialism, instead, as a family resemblance term.

On that basis, it argues quite an ambitions claim, viz. that all versions of consequentialism should be rejected, including those that have been created in response to conventional criticisms.

The book covers a number of classic themes in normative ethics, metaethics and, particularly, ethical methodology and also touches upon certain aspects of experimental moral philosophy.

It is written in clear language and is analytic in its argumentative style.

As such, the book should appeal to students, graduate students as well as professional academics with an interest in analytic moral philosophy.

Information

Other Formats

£44.99

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Theory and Decision Library A: series  |  View all