Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Race, Markets, and Social Outcomes, Paperback / softback Book

Race, Markets, and Social Outcomes Paperback / softback

Edited by Patrick L. Mason, Rhonda M. Williams

Part of the Recent Economic Thought series

Paperback / softback

Description

THE JANUS-FACE OF RACE: REFLEC- TIONS ON ECONOMIC THEORY Patrick L.

Mason and Rhonda Williams Many economists are willing to accept that race is a significant factor in US eco­ nomic and social affairs.

Yet the professional literature displays a peculiar schizo­ phrenia when faced with the task of actually formulating what race means and how race works in our political economy.

On the one hand, race matters when the dis­ cussion is focused on anti-social behavior, social choices, and undesired market outcomes.

Inexplicably, African Americans are more likely to prefer welfare, lower labor force participation, and unemployment.

On the other hand, race does not matter when the subject of discussion is economically productive or socially accept­ able activities and legal market choices (for example, wages and employment).

This Janus-faced construction of race is maintained by economists' stubborn ad­ herence to the market power hypothesis.

The market power hypothesis asserts that racial discrimination and market competition are inversely correlated.

Discrimina­ tory behavior will persist only in those sectors of society where the competitive forces of the market are least operative.

When applied to the labor market, the mar­ ket power hypothesis suggests that pre- and post-labor market decisions represent disjoint sets.

On average, members of a disadvantaged social group may accumulate a lower amount of or a lower quality of productive attributes because of discrimina­ tion in marital, residential, or school choice, or because of substantial animosity in day-to-day interpersonal relations with members of a privileged group.

Information

Save 13%

£127.50

£110.45

Item not Available
 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Recent Economic Thought series