Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design : Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review, PDF eBook

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design : Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

The decisions courts make in constitutional rights cases pervade our political life and touch on our most basic interests and values.

The spread of judicial review of legislation around the world means that courts are increasingly called on to settle matters of moral and political controversy, including assisted suicide, data privacy, anti-terrorism measures, marriage, and abortion.

But doubts regarding the institutional capacities of courts for deciding such questions are growing.

Judges now regularly review social science research to assess whether a law will effectively achieve its aim, and at what cost to other interests.

They cite studies and statistical information from psychology, sociology, medicine, and other disciplines in which they are rarely trained.

This empirical reasoning proceeds alongside open-ended moral reasoning, with judges employing terms such as equality, liberty, and autonomy, then determining what these require in concrete circumstances.

This book shows that courts were not designed for this kind of moral and empirical reasoning.

It argues that in comparison to legislatures, the institutional capacities of courts are deficient.

Legislatures are better equipped than courts for deliberating and decision-making in regard to the kinds of factual and moral issues that arise in constitutional rights cases.

The book concludes by considering the implications of comparative institutional capacity for constitutional design.

Is a system of judicial review of legislation something that constitutional framers should choose to adopt?

If so, in what form? For countries with systems of judicial review, practical proposals are made to remedy deficiencies in the institutional capacities of courts.

Information

Information