Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Universals of Legal Reasoning by Judges : A Plea for Candour in Decision-Making, Hardback Book

Universals of Legal Reasoning by Judges : A Plea for Candour in Decision-Making Hardback

Hardback

Description

Universals in Legal Reasoning by Judges explores and expounds the usage of rules to justify judicial decisions.

Inspired by Savigny's canons of interpretation, and informed by the author's years of study and teaching in Germany, the book constructs a matrix for all legal argumentation in place of the so-called rules of interpretation, classifying justificatory arguments into four categories: textual, historical, purposive, and system-contextual.

Along these categories, the book reveals certain universals while dispelling the confusion and mystery surrounding reasoning from judicial case decisions.

This it does — simply and elegantly — by equating reasoning from case decisions with reasoning from statute.

A myriad of examples, primarily from Germany, California, and the United Kingdom, show how these arguments find universal application.

From start to finish, this book is itself an argument: an argument for judicial transparency and candour, which requires that judges reveal their thoughts and motivations-their ultimate reasons.

This is necessary to enhance the persuasiveness and efficacy of judicial precedents, to foster democratic legitimacy, and to permit political accountability.

Information

£90.00

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information