Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Hollywood Highbrow : From Entertainment to Art, Hardback Book

Hollywood Highbrow : From Entertainment to Art Hardback

Part of the Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology series

Hardback

Description

Today's moviegoers and critics generally consider some Hollywood products--even some blockbusters--to be legitimate works of art.

But during the first half century of motion pictures very few Americans would have thought to call an American movie "art." Up through the 1950s, American movies were regarded as a form of popular, even lower-class, entertainment.

By the 1960s and 1970s, however, viewers were regularly judging Hollywood films by artistic criteria previously applied only to high art forms.

In Hollywood Highbrow, Shyon Baumann for the first time tells how social and cultural forces radically changed the public's perceptions of American movies just as those forces were radically changing the movies themselves.

The development in the United States of an appreciation of film as an art was, Baumann shows, the product of large changes in Hollywood and American society as a whole.

With the postwar rise of television, American movie audiences shrank dramatically and Hollywood responded by appealing to richer and more educated viewers. Around the same time, European ideas about the director as artist, an easing of censorship, and the development of art-house cinemas, film festivals, and the academic field of film studies encouraged the idea that some American movies--and not just European ones--deserved to be considered art.

Information

Save 12%

£58.00

£50.49

 
Free Home Delivery

on all orders

 
Pick up orders

from local bookshops

Information

Also in the Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology series  |  View all