Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.

Structural Redesign in an Organized Anarchy : Implications for Implementing Change, PDF eBook

Structural Redesign in an Organized Anarchy : Implications for Implementing Change PDF

PDF

Please note: eBooks can only be purchased with a UK issued credit card and all our eBooks (ePub and PDF) are DRM protected.

Description

Whilst the greatest effort has been made to ensure the quality of this text, due to the historical nature of this content, in some rare cases there may be minor issues with legibility.

This paper presents data from a study of planned structural redesign to challenge several assumptions underlying theories of planned change (1).

First, I describe and analyze the experience at Worldwide Action for Development (WW) to establish a divisional structure based on the location of the implementation and result in unanticipated outcomes.

I then consider the implications for how planned change can be handled when circumstances undermine the validity of core assumptions about how or why organizations change.<br><br>A variety of theories have been developed and tested to understand and predict processes of planned organizational change.

These models have evolves from different research traditions to emphasize diagnosis (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1969; Porras, 1987), intervention (Schein, 1969; Argyris, 1970), and change management (Nadler, 1981; Beckhard & Harris, 1987).

We would expect the application of a particular theory of planned change to depend upon the type of organization, the design of the change intervention, and the circumstances that initiated it.

Indeed most theorists are careful to include a situational or contingent component to their models recognizing that change is a fluid process which cannot be completely blueprinted and is not easily managed (2).<br><br>Yet these techniques presuppose a manager's desire and ability to articulate an organizational purpose or mission, or the end state of some change process.

Information

Information